There are many views on panel interviews, but if you want to increase assessment accuracy and save time, you should consider conducting more panel interviews. These are much better than an all-day series of one-on-one 45-60-minute interviews. When organized properly, panel interviews help everybody involved learn more about the candidate, even weaker interviewers, if they just observe. Panel interviews also provide a great means for subordinates to get involved in the hiring process. Subordinates should never conduct one-on-one interviews, since they usually are trying to work for someone they like, so they focus on the wrong issues. For another, they're rarely objective, and worse, many of them are weak interviewers. A panel interview overcomes all of these problems. As long as they're well organized, panel interviews provide a truer picture of a candidate than the one-on-one interview.

Here's why:

•They're more objective since there is less personal interaction. It's hard to chit-chat during a panel interview, which is a good thing, since chit-chatting is a waste of time.

•You have a chance to think more about the candidate's responses since you're not the only one asking questions. This increases the validity of the assessment. In most one-on-one interviews, you're often thinking about what you're going to ask next, rather than listening to the candidate's answer.

•You don't make instant judgments about the quality of an answer while the candidate is answering because others are asking for clarifying information. This is one of the reasons one-on-one interviews aren't very effective. More in-depth responses are possible when others are helping with the fact-finding.

•It's a great way for subordinates to meet the candidate without the typical awkwardness. Since it's less of a personality-based interview, their hidden agendas stay hidden.

•Strong candidates like panel interviews as long as they're well organized and if the candidate is not put into an intimidating situation. With a panel interview, you'll also see more of the candidate's true personality, especially if most of the follow-up questions are about how accomplishments were achieved.

•It saves time. It only takes three or four people one to two hours to conduct a complete interview versus a whole day and how is the candidate going to perform in the last interview after being asked many of the same questions over and over again.

•It allows weaker interviewers to be involved. This is especially important if the weaker interviewer is the hiring manager.

•The assessment is more accurate and consistent. Since everyone is using the same information to make an assessment, consistency is achieved. If the panel interview is led by someone who conducts a comprehensive performance-based interview, the information obtained is extremely insightful. This is something the other interviewers couldn't have obtained on their own.
How to Organize and Conduct a Panel Interview The panel should include no more than three or four people. Otherwise, it can be both intimidating and unwieldy. One interviewer should be the leader, and everyone else is in a support position. This is critical. Too many panel interviews go awry as everyone competes to ask their own questions. While all of the interviewers need to be involved throughout the interview, the difference in the two roles needs to be very clear.

The Primary Interviewer: This person leads the panel session, acting as the host and describing to the candidate how the interview will be conducted. During the actual panel interview, the primary interviewer will ask the basic questions and follow up with some fact-finding. Only the primary interviewer can change the topic or the focus of the question.

Secondary Interviewers: Every other member of the panel interviewing team is in a support role. However, they should be active during the interviewing, asking for examples and clarifying information. These people help the primary interviewer peel the onion by following up the main questions with questions like, "Can you give me an example of what you mean?" "When did that happen?" and "What were the results?" Organized properly, this type of panel interview follows a very natural flow and reveals a great deal of useful information.

It's okay if one of the secondary interviewers becomes a primary interviewer for a different question or for a different section of the interview. For example, someone can take on the primary responsibility for a question addressing a job-related technical accomplishment while someone else can be the primary interviewer for a different accomplishment, like team or management focus. If this type of shift is made, plan ahead of time to minimize any confusion. In this case, make sure that everyone else takes a support role asking for clarifying information.

Make sure all interviewers have read the performance profile for the job before convening. Make the thrust of the interview a discussion of the candidate's major accomplishments. It's okay to ask the candidate to come prepared to discuss a few of his/her most relevant major accomplishments. This will improve the information exchange. As part of this, ask the candidate to be prepared to cover individual contributor, team, and management projects. You should conduct a 10
-Factor Candidate Assessment of the most important deliverables right after the interview to capture everyone's comments.

The only potential problems with panel interviews are that they can be intimidating to the candidate. Describe the format of the session a few days beforehand to ease the candidate's fears. During the interview, use a round table or seat the candidate in the middle of a long table. The candidate will feel like one of the team this way. Don't make it seem like an interrogation. It's better to be low-keyed by requesting more information in a neutral tone of voice.

As long as they're properly organized, panel interviews are great for increasing assessment accuracy. Try one using our two-question performance-based interview for even better results. Before you know it, you'll be making fewer hiring mistakes and hiring better people.

This process is used by many of the Corporations that seem to have the greatest success in hiring the best and the brightest.

Lou Adler
April 2009

 ↑ Back to Top